Chicago (IL) – The announcement of Palm’s new smartphone (dubbed Pre) has clearly sent shivers down Apple’s spine; partly
because several key engineers with a deep knowledge of Apple’s secrets
switched over to Palm, but mainly because Pre is the first iPhone rival
to use multi-fingered gestures like pinch zoom. Armed with the 358 page
iPhone patent awarded last week, Timothy Cook who runs Apple in Jobs’
absence has now threatened Palm with legal action. Palm is not letting on that
it’s shaken, but make no mistake – too much is at stake here: Both Palm’s
very survival and iPhone’s fate. If the two companies meet in
court, it could turn out to be the most interesting and entertaining
lawsuit of 2009 (or the decade).
“Boy, have we patented it!”, said Steve Jobs
during the world’s first iPhone presentation in January 2007. Two years
and several would-be iPhone killers later and the mobile industry still
lacks a cellphone that would employ multi-fingered gestures like pinch
zoom that made the iPhone famous. It’s not that iPhone rivals lack
technical expertise to engineer multi-touch-capable smartphone. On the
contrary, it is sheer fear of lawsuits by one of the world’s most
powerful consumer electronics giant that is keeping multi-touch as an
exclusive realm of the iPhone. With Pre, Palm is willing to challenge
this and put its future at stake in the process as the company might
find out that Jobs’ words were not empty threats.
Apple got the iPhone patent
As revealed in Apple’s mammoth 358 page patent application
filed with the US Patent & Trademark Office last spring, Apple put
its money where its CEO’s mouth was. The patent application, entitled “Touch Screen Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for
Determining Commands by Applying Heuristics,” describes all aspects of
iPhone’s touch screen, UI and methods in details. The patent, awarded to Apple this past week, credits no other but Steve Jobs as the
registered holder, followed with 24 other
named engineers like vice president of iPhone software Scott Forstall and
Wayne Westerman. The latter is the key to multi-touch technology used in the iPhone.
MOTHER OF ALL IPHONE PATENTS
Apple was awarded last week a mammoth 358 page patent that covers all aspects of the iPhone’s user interface, with especial emphasis on multi-touch and the way gestures are implemented.
History of multi-touch
of multi-touch date back to 1982 when the first touch screen was
engineered at the University of Toronto
that could register more than one
touch at a time. At the same time, Bell Labs (now part of
Alcatel-Lucent) published what is believed to be the first paper
dealing with user
interfaces associated with touch screens and made its first multi-touch
screen two years later. The technology went unnoticed until 1991 when
Pierre Wellner published a paper about so-called
digital desk that envision multi-fingered gestures, including pinching
It captured the imagination of University of Delaware
academics Wayne Westerman and John Elias who started experimenting with
possible uses through their Newark-based startup, Fingerworks. The
company made keyboards and touchpads with opaque surface that could
recognize gestures and Westerman even published a dissertation on the
subject in 1999. Their work caught attention of Apple who was at the
time researching early iPhone ideas so the company acquired Fingerworks
in 2005. As part of the deal, Westerman moved in Apple’s headquarters
to continue developing multi-touch for Apple’s handset.
A closer look at “the mother of all iPhone patents”
358 page patent is also called “the mother of all iPhone patents” with
a good reason. It outlines iPhone’s features and UI in excruciating
detail, including the software and how gestures like finger swipe or
pinch zoom are detected. The patent also provides a sneak peek at
next-gen iPhones by listing several features not included with
current-gen iPhones, like applications for blogging, instant messaging,
digital video capturing, video conferencing, MMS, etc. Multi-touch
aspects of the patent, without any doubt, are the most important to
Continued on next page: Palm Pre, Legal clash between Apple and Palm, Conclusion…
Palm’s Pre infringes the iPhone patent?
Palm announced Pre at the CES earlier this month, the tech press quickly
dubbed the smartphone as the most serious iPhone rival to date.
Analysts also think it is Palm’s last chance of survival. Apple and RIM
have washed away much of Palm’s marketshare, while sliding profits
forced the company to accept a $325 million of VC capital from
Elevation Partners last year. Pre is scheduled for arrival in the first
half of this year, roughly at the same time when Apple is expected to
unveil an iPhone successor at its developer conference this coming July.
As the two handsets go head to head in the marketplace, their vendors
could go head to head in the courtroom.
WebOS, the entirely new
OS which powers Pre, sports striking similarities to iPhone’s UI
including gestures like pinch zoom. The way the phone implements its
touch-sensitive panel could also clash with the iPhone patent. For
example, Apple describes iPhone’s touch panel in the patent as a
“touch-sensitive area of the device that, unlike the touch screen, does
not display visual output. The touchpad may be a touch-sensitive
surface that is separate from the touch screen or an extension of the
touch-sensitive surface formed by the touch screen.” Palm’s press release
describes Pre’s touch panel as “a gesture area, which enables simple,
intuitive gestures for navigation.” Just like with iPhone, Palm’s
gesture area is separate from the touch screen.
THE BIGGEST IPHONE THREAT TO DATE
Palm’s Pre announcement provoked Apple to threaten legal actions. Pre is the only handset besides iPhone that is advertise to bring multi-touch support with familiar pinch zoom and finger swipe gestures.
Apple: “We will go after anybody who rips our IP”
chief of operations Timothy Cook was quoted during recent earnings call
with investors as saying, “We like competition, as long as
they don’t rip off our intellectual property. And if they do, were
going to go after anybody that does.” Although Cook refused to name
Palm, he stressed that Apple is “ready to suit up and go against
anyone,” adding that the company “will not
stand for having its IP ripped off.” He warned would-be copycats that
Apple will use “whatever weapons that
we have at our disposal.” The comment sent Palm’s shares down 3.4% to
$7.57 in afternoon trading on Nasdaq – enough to deliver the message.
RIM: “Bring it on”
The comment provoked Palm’s reaction. The company’s spokeswoman Lynn Fox told Reuters
that “Apple was not the first to do multi-touch,” arguing that the
technology has been around for over 20 years. Indeed, Palm pioneered
touch-based gadgets with the famous Pilot PDA and now has several
touch-enabled products on the market like Treo and Centro. Fox stressed that Palm “has been building its own intellectual property
portfolio for 15 years.” Commenting on Apple’s threat, she said that Palm “will defend [its IP] vigorously, if
necessary.” Fox also told WSJ’s All Things Digital that it has the tools necessary to defend itself if faced with legal actions from Apple, citing Palm’s robust patent portfolio (via Google Patent Search) and “fundamental patents in the mobile space.”
understandable that Apple is nervous: After all, its lead in the
smartphone sector is at stake. If Apple’s warning shot does not deter
Palm, the company might have to take its rival to court. If Palm can
challenge the iPhone patent and Apple loses the case, the floodgates will
open. As a result, everyone and their Mom could copy this most unique
aspect of the iPhone. Apple also got emotional because Palm recruited
several of its executives with a deep knowledge of Apple’s R&D
process, like hardware engineer Jon Rubenstein.
Steve Jobs recruited Rubenstein in 1990 as NeXT hardware engineer and
later brought him to Apple where Rubenstein led the development of both
the original iMac and iPod and became the first chief of Apple’s iPod
division in 2004. He elected to retire in 2005 and joined Palm late
October 2007. Apple’s ex finance chief Fred Anderson also jumped the
boat to work as Palm’s director, while Palm’s software director Chris
McKillop worked on the iPhone and iPod development teams.
Rubenstein spent 15 years at Apple where his ranking allowed him access
to many secrets, Apple obviously suspects he might have used them to
build an iPhone killer. Ironically enough, it is for the same reason that
IBM blocked its ex-executive Mark Papermaster from joining Apple,
citing his deep knowledge of Blade serves and engineering secrets.
Papermater is rumored to lead Apple’s P.A. Semi engineering team and
oversee the development of system-on-chips for future iPhones.
in all, Palm’s survival and iPhone’s fate are literally at stake here.
With many companies around that hold patents to various embodiments of
the multi-touch technology, the guy who blinks first may lose it all.
ALL IS AT STAKEAnalysts warn that Pre is Palm’s last chance for survival. But if Apple fails to hold to its multi-touch paten in court, a floodgate may open that could allow Apple’s rivals to copy unique iPhone features.