New bill would ban Internet ‘fast lanes’

In an effort to make themselves look like the good guys five democrats have introduced a new bill that would insure true net neutrality…assuming they can get it passed.

The Online Competition and Consumer Choice Act, was introduced today by Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Representative Doris Matsui of California, along with three other Democrats. The bill would prevent broadband providers from collecting fees from websites and online services for preferential traffic handling.

If passed, the bill would require the FCC to prohibit paid prioritization agreements between ISPs and content providers on the last-mile Internet connection, and it would prohibit broadband providers from giving preferential treatment to its own last-mile Internet traffic or the traffic of its affiliates over the traffic of competitors.

In a statement Senator Patrick Leahy said, “Americans are speaking loud and clear—they want an Internet that is a platform for free expression and innovation, where the best ideas and services can reach consumers based on merit rather than based on a financial relationship with a broadband provider.”

Representative Doris Matsui added, “Our country cannot afford ‘pay-for-play’ schemes that divide our Internet into tiers based on who has the deepest pockets. This is essential to the growth of our economy, and the health of our democracy.”

Pretty words. Nice idea. No chance in hell.

The bill, while noble in its intent, has almost no chance of passing since the Republican-dominated House of Representatives has developed a policy of automatically rejecting anything that has a Democrat’s name on it. Plus the Republicans have made it pretty clear that they oppose any sort of net neutrality (or progress of any sort for that matter).

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler might actually back a bill like this since it could finally give the FCC legal authority to regulate ISPs – a power that the FCC has been looking for. The FCC’s revised proposal on net neutrality has caused a firestorm recently because it opens the door for ISPs to charge some content providers for better service. That little caveat generated more than 120,000 comments from enraged Americans, a blizzard of standup comedian ridicule and heated debate on Capitol Hill.

What people mostly missed was the fact that Wheeler and the FCC had to revise the proposal in the first place because the courts threw out a case where the FCC tried to fine Comcast for infractions of their original rules. The court decided that the FCC didn’t actually have the power to fine any ISP because ISPs don’t fall under FCC authority.

Buy hey, at least there are a few politicians making a effort to do the right thing – even if it is only a token effort.

Guy Wright

Guy Wright has been covering the technology space since the days when computers had cranks and networks were steam powered. He has been a writer and editor for more years then he cares to admit.


How Cisco Outperforms Everyone on Social Responsibility and Philanthropy with Less Money

I had an interesting chat with Peter Tavernise, Cisco’s Director of Corporate Affairs on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). I left with the impression that most everyone else is doing this all wrong. With a relatively small budget, Cisco appears to be having a much bigger positive impact on the world’s problems because they focus on fixing the problem not just on giving money or having that one big media moment and then going on with their lives. When they go into a project, it is with a desire to actually make an impact. Only a small part of their overall effort is to give cash, the...

Is the next Bond going to be a woman?

My name is Bond, Jane Bond!?

Five Smartphones with impressive Battery Lives

These phones will ensure that you don’t need to think of carrying a powerbank again.