Comcast wants you to share your WiFi

Earlier today Comcast started turning Houston subscribers into WiFi sharers. Up to 150,000 Comcast routers were activated with a new ‘xfinitywifi’ initiative that effectively makes them WiFi hotspots.

Comcast began activating the equivalent of ‘guest mode’ on Arris Touchstone Telephony Wireless Gateway Modems that the company has been supplying to newer customers effectively turning the routers into local WiFi hotspots. The hotspots can be accessed by any other Comcast broadband customer for an unlimited amount of time.

Comcast has been doing this for a while and plans to activate over 8 million xfinitywifi hotspots across the country by the end of the year.

Related: AT&T halts fiber build-out in move against net neutrality

There are lots of tricky bits here and Comcast is being a bit vague about some of the details.

First off, this is an ‘opt out’ situation. Customers have to specifically request that they not share their bandwidth with strangers. Comcast claims that sharing will not impact subscriber’s broadband speeds or use up their allotted amount of bandwidth (assuming they are a fixed tier plan).

According to Comcast’s WiFi FAQ page, “This XFINITY WiFi service is completely separate from your secure WiFi home network,” and “The broadband connection to your home will be unaffected by the XFINITY WiFifeature.” However they go on to say, “Your in-home WiFi network, as well as XFINITY WiFi, use shared spectrum, and as with any shared medium there can be some impact as more devices share WiFi. We have provisioned the XFINITY WiFi feature to support robust usage, and therefore, we anticipate minimal impact to the in-home WiFi network.”

So which is it? The broadband connection to the home ‘will be unaffected’ or ‘there can be some impact as more devices share WiFi?’ You can’t have it both ways. And I’m pretty sure that Comcast’s rationalization for charging Netflix a special fee for delivering content was because they were causing so much network congestion. Did Comcast suddenly find extra bandwidth somewhere that they can use for xfinitywifi but can’t use to clear up network congestion for some reason?

Related: Can security companies control the IoT world?

There is also another interesting bit on their FAQ regarding people who are not Comcast customers. Apparently anyone can access these hotspots.

“At select XFINITY WiFi hotspot locations, visitors are allowed two 60-minute complimentary sessions per month.”

And if strangers want to pay to log onto your network they can, “Use XFINITY WiFi for an hour, a day or a week by purchasing an XFINITY WiFi Access Pass.”

So Comcast is going to charge non-Comcast customers a fee to access broadband connections that their broadband customers already pay for. Just to be clear, Comcast charges customers for broadband connections and they charge Netflix to send content over those broadband connections and now they are going to charge non-Comcast customers to access those same connections. Is there anyone else they can charge for the same thing? Great business planning if you think about it. Deploy once and charge multiple people for the same thing. I wonder when they are going to charge customers an opt-out fee?

Guy Wright

Guy Wright has been covering the technology space since the days when computers had cranks and networks were steam powered. He has been a writer and editor for more years then he cares to admit. He has lost count of the number of articles, blogs, reviews, rants and books that he has published over the years, but he hasn’t stopped learning and writing about new things.


Huawei investigates Huawei investigators and finds no evil

In an attempt to legitimize the Huawei-created Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre (HCSEC) Huawei has created the HCSEC Oversight Board – again, with Huawei employees in place.

Slack chat hacked

In yet another case of hackers worming their way into yet another company’s database, the group chat tool Slack admitted last Friday that they too have fallen victim.

Google’s cookie monster bites back

A UK Court of Appeals has dismissed Google’s request to have a case dropped over its use of use of tracking cookies in Safari browsers back in 2011 and 2012.