Analysis: Vista's Ready Boost is no match for RAM

Posted by Patrick Schmid

Chicago (IL) - There's a new way to enhance your cache in Vista - simply plug in your Flash memory stick. But how much performance gain can you really expect? TG Daily ran an average PC through a benchmark parcours and discovered that the old rules still apply: There is no substitute for an adequate amount of system memory. Period.

Windows Vista was released almost two weeks ago, and it split users worldwide into two camps. There are those users who simply love the new look and feel and the operating system's broad spectrum of new features; all of these serving the purpose of making Windows Vista the smoothest, most accessible, user-friendly and most communicative Windows ever. For users looking for more performance, Vista includes SuperFetch and ReadyBoost - two features that promise a smooth performance experience.

But other users complain about Vista; among the Vista downsides is the fact that application performance simply is not at the level of Windows XP (a result of the increased number of services and the fancy 3D Aero Glass interface). No matter how you slice it, one of the essential requirements of Vista is memory.

 

Once you have upgraded to Vista - we recommend that your PC isn't older than two years and you make sure that all drivers for your hardware are available - we believe that Vista's SuperFetch and ReadyBoost will convince even the skeptics and XP hardliners that Windows Vista does more good than harm overall. Based on our test results, these two features can improve application launch time on Vista-appropriate computers by 50 to 70%. The subjective experience of SuperFetch proves to be more significant than any hardware upgrade could ever be, provided the processor and available RAM meet minimum requirements.

Let's have a closer look.

Basics 1: SuperFetch offers non-volatile application pre-caching

You may have already heard of SuperFetch, as its benefits are indeed not bad. Facts first: The feature is available in all versions of Windows Vista: Most computers always have a certain amount of unused main memory capacity, which SuperFetch utilizes to automatically pre-load your favorite applications into these memory areas. Microsoft refers to this process as elimination of so-called cold memory states, where available RAM is unused. In order to pre-cache applications, the SuperFetch service keeps track of which applications are launched either regularly or most frequently. Provided that there is sufficient memory available, SuperFetch will populate the available space with as many applications as possible.

The reason for pre-buffering application data into the main memory is very simple: If you launch an application in Windows XP it has to be fetched from the hard drive before it can be executed. Since hard drives are rather slow in comparison to RAM (60-90 MB/s disk transfer rate vs. 5-7 GB/s RAM throughput), RAM access is much faster than hard drive I/O operations. In effect, SuperFetch provides faster application launch times.

Although this sounds similar to conventional Windows caching, the feature is more intelligent: Caching is ineffective as soon as you restart your system or the memory is flushed by anything else. SuperFetch will repopulate the application data once you boot your system during idle times.

However, the feature does not come for free: You do need free memory for SuperFetch to work efficiently. Typically, 512 MB RAM is not enough to experience quicker application launches over time, as Windows Vista will require all the memory for itself and a limited amount of applications. At 1 and 2 GB RAM, SuperFetch makes quite an impact. Since a very large number of users works with 512 MB RAM today, Microsoft came up with a way to provide the SuperFetch benefits without having to upgrade your RAM: ReadyBoost.

Basics 2: ReadyBoost swaps SuperFetch data onto USB Flash memory

The only reasonable way to expand your memory capacity for the sake of assisting SuperFetch from the outside of any PC is the USB 2.0 interface. Virtually every PC out there has some USB ports, and a large number of users have USB Flash memory devices, so why not take advantage of these? ReadyBoost works with every Vista PC and every USB 2.0 Flash memory device that is at least somewhat fast (approx. 80X+).

 

ReadyBoost works with every USB 2.0 Flash memory stick as long as it is fast enough.

After plugging in a USB 2.0 Flash memory stick into an unused USB 2.0 port, Windows Vista recognizes the new mass storage device and wants to know what to do with it. One option is to select it to improve system performance. You may limit the capacity used by ReadyBoost, or you may use the full USB 2.0 Flash device.

After successful installation, Windows Vista will use the additional storage capacity to flex its SuperFetch muscles and populate additional applications on the Flash drive. Although no USB 2.0 device offers the throughput of a fast hard drive (20-25 MB/s max for USB 2.0 Flash devices vs. 60-90 MB/s for hard drives), Flash storage shines with its literally nonexistent access times. Hard drives are slowed down considerably by the head movements required to access data. Also keep in mind the systems with little amounts of RAM: Vista can use the entire physical RAM for applications, while the ReadyBoost-enabled USB 2.0 Flash device will be used for application buffering.

The idea of utilizing existing technology (and products that probably can be found almost anywhere today) sounds appealing. But what do you do with your Vista mainstream PC? Do you buy regular DRAM or do you buy Flash memory? And if you have an existing Flash drive sitting on your desk, how much additional performance will it bring?

Let's check.

Read on the next page: ReadyBoost application performance

 


 

ReadyBoost application performance

Test setup

We took a look at the ReadyBoost feature by utilizing two different USB 2.0 Flash memory sticks (a fast one and an average one), launching a selection of popular Windows applications. To make the whole analysis useful for as many users as possible, we did not use a high-end computer, but we put together a setup that is roughly two years old: A Pentium 4 processor 620 (2.8 GHz), 512 MB and 1 GB of RAM and a 7200 RPM Seagate Barracuda hard drive.

 

We tested this setup with Microsoft Outlook 2007 and a 1.4 GB PST file, which is the file containing your contacts, calendar and email data. The second application was Apple's iTunes 7, which we loaded with several hundred megabytes of music. Last but not least we had the Adobe Acrobat Reader 8 open a 22 MB PDF document, containing 1273 text pages.

We did a total of nine runs launching all three applications, using 512 MB and 1 GB RAM, without an USB 2.0 Flash device, with the dual-channel device by Kingston or the single-channel device by Memina. We assigned 1 GB memory in both cases.

Every three runs we restarted the test system to see how well SuperFetch actually works. We also waited 90 seconds before launching each application, because we wanted SuperFetch to have enough time to do its homework and buffer application data into available RAM or the USB 2.0 ReadyBoost drive. Details on the USB 2.0 Flash memory sticks used can be found here.

Microsoft Outlook 2007 startup time

 

With only 512 MB RAM, starting Outlook 2007 for the first time took painfully long. But SuperFetch learns: On average, startup time decreased from 12 to 8 seconds over time. Using USB 2.0 devices has an interesting impact: While initially the startup time increases to as much as 20 seconds, it decreases considerably as SuperFetch learns that Outlook is launched repeatedly. The orange curve represents the slow, single-channel USB 2.0 Flash device. Note that it does not necessarily improve application startup performance.

 

At 1 GB RAM, the situation is entirely different: Only the first Outlook 2007 call, which is done off the hard drive, takes 9-10 seconds. From the second start and on, launch time for Outlook shrinks to as little as 2-3 seconds. Whether attaching a USB 2.0 Flash drive to assist SuperFetch makes sense or not remains questionable here.

Read on the next page: iTunes 7, Acrobat 8 and our conclusion

 


 

ReadyBoost application performance, continued

Apple iTunes 7 startup time

 

For Apple's iTunes 7 and 512 MB RAM, SuperFetch reduces the launch time from 15 seconds at the initial start to 10-12 seconds over time. If you add one of our USB 2.0 Flash memory devices, you can save another 2-3 seconds. Clearly, the dual-channel high performance Flash drive from Kingston delivers better ReadyBoost performance than the Memina single-channel drive.

 

By having 1 GB or RAM instead of 512 MB, the time to launch iTunes 7 drops from 8-15 seconds to as little as 4-7 seconds!

 

 

Adobe Acrobat 8 Reader startup time

 

 

Acrobat Reader 8, launched by double-clicking our 22-MB pdf document, requires 8-10 seconds to launch. This benchmark chart shows clearly that Adobe Acrobat Reader 8 and Windows Vista eat up all the available 512 MB RAM, because SuperFetch does not show much of a positive effect. The result is entirely different if a USB 2.0 Flash drive is added for the purpose of serving ReadyBoost: Starting the document now takes between 6 and 8 seconds.

 

Nobody should be surprised that this procedure takes only 2-5 seconds with more RAM. 1 GB of RAM has tremendous advantages over 512 MB in terms of application startup performance! Adding a memory stick still increases performance, though.

 

Conclusion: Get 1 GB of RAM, then get Vista, then consider using a USB stick

Our first intention was to analyze the impact of different USB 2.0 Flash memory devices, but we quickly determined during our testing that the performance delta between very little and ample main memory size is the key requirement for Windows Vista performance. We can't help but stressing that 512 MB RAM just does not cut it.

Although an additional USB 2.0 Flash memory device clearly helps to increase application responsiveness at launch time (we've experienced time savings in this area of up to 50%), upgrading an average computer from 512 MB to at least 1 GB of RAM makes a huge difference. Microsoft may argue that adding a Flash memory stick already has a tremendous impact on subjective performance, reducing application launch times considerably. And that's all true; the performance impact is considerable, but Windows Vista still remains slow in the end.

The performance gain that is achieved from going from 512 MB to 1 GB, which is a very affordable decision nowadays, is absolutely worth the money, even if you have to drag your computer into a local PC store and have service people take care of the upgrade.

ReadyBoost is a nice feature, but it is an extension to SuperFetch, which is the basis for all performance improvements we observed. If you have a fast USB 2.0 Flash memory stick it doesn't hurt to use it. But the big deal has always been getting enough RAM. After all we're talking about Windows: Some things never change.

 

More RAM will influence the Windows Vista performance rating. A USB 2.0 Flash memory drive for use with ReadyDrive won't.