UK spying on Google, Facebook etc. perfectly legal



The BBC News has reported that according to Charles Farr, director general of the Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism, spying on American-based search and social media traffic was perfectly legal under British law.

Farr told Privacy International that Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and web searches on Google - as well as webmail services such as Hotmail and Yahoo - were classified as "external communications," which meant they could be intercepted without specific warrants.

According to the BBC story:

Internal communications between citizens can only be intercepted when a targeted warrant is issued. Warrants must be signed by a minister and can only be issued when there is suspicion of illegal activity.

Related: Delaware first state to enact digital inheritance law

But when someone searches for something on Google or posts on Facebook they are sending information overseas - constituting an act of external communication that could be collected under a broader warrant which does not need to be signed by a minister, explained Mr Farr in a 48-page written statement.

But then, in what has to be one of the most absurd, side-stepping rationalizations Farr added that the data collected "cannot be read, looked at or listened to" except in strictly limited circumstances.

Mr Farr also said there was a "significant distinction" between intercepting material and a person actually reading, looking at or listening it.

Um…okay.

Related: Facebook class action lawsuit has over 11,000 plaintiffs

Eric King, deputy director of Privacy International, said the revelation showed that spy agencies operate under their own laws. "Intelligence agencies cannot be considered accountable to Parliament and to the public they serve when their actions are obfuscated through secret interpretations of Byzantine laws."

Privacy researcher Caspar Bowden suggested the British laws concerning spying on, but not reading communications that cross international borders might be just a bit obscurely worded. "Interpreting that section requires the unravelling of a triple-nested inversion of meanings across six cross-referenced subsections, linked to a dozen other cross-linked definitions, which are all dependent on a highly ambiguous 'notwithstanding'," he said.

So it’s alright to collect all that information but it’s not alright to read, look at or listen to it. Isn’t that a bit like saying you can make bootleg copies of a thousand movies and copies of 10,000 pop songs but it’s not actually illegal unless you watch the movies or listen to the songs?

You can read the full BBC story here.

 



Guy Wright

Guy Wright has been covering the technology space since the days when computers had cranks and networks were steam powered. He has been a writer and editor for many of the most influential publications over the years – publications that helped shape our current technological zeitgeist. He has lost count of the number of articles, blogs, reviews, rants, and books that he has published over the years, but he hasn’t stopped learning and writing about new things.


More

Windows 9 is coming but we should stop it before we get Windows 10

Ditching Windows: liberating your computing experience

Microsoft may be getting on to Windows 9 soon, but it's time to move on for the greater good.

Delaware first state to enact digital inheritance law

A bill recently passed in the state of Delaware would give family members the right to access a deceased person’s digital files.

Samsung and Barnes & Noble team on new Nook

It’s not exactly clear who is driving this boat but Samsung and Barnes & Noble have teamed up on a new Nook reading device that’s more like a tablet.