Anonymous halts attacks against Sony's PlayStation Network

Posted by Trent Nouveau

Cyber activists associated with Anonymous and the splinter SonyRecon cell have halted their digital offensive against the PlayStation network.

An Anonymous communiqué acknowledged that targeting the network was "not a good idea," as it "severely impacted" Sony customers.

Anonymous halts attacks against Sony's PlayStation Network"Anonymous is on your side, standing up for your rights. We are not aiming to attack customers of Sony. This attack is aimed solely at Sony, and we will try our best to not affect the gamers, as this would defeat the purpose of our actions. If we did inconvenience users, please know that this was not our goal," read the communiqué.

"This operation is a response to Sony's attempt to deprive their customers of products they bought and therefore own, wholly and completely. Anonymous will not attempt to fight this by following the exact same course of action. We have plenty of tricks up our sleeves."

The communiqué also noted that Sony continues to mistreat PS3 hackers, while routinely misleading the public with false propaganda about jailbreaking by linking the popular practice to piracy.

"Jailbreaking actually just means you are making YOUR device do what it should do. Imagine if Microsoft forced you to use Internet Explorer instead of Firefox or Chrome. Imagine if they denied users from using any other web browser than their own. Many people would obviously be pissed... but then, why aren't you pissed at Sony?”

"The fact that their litigation demanded information on everyone who had viewed [jailbreaking] material, was completely unacceptable. This is a threat not only to the gaming community, but to freedom of information in general. The fact that the privacy of individuals can be violated, simply for accessing information, and legal action can be taken for doing something with something you own, are steps far beyond the line. 



  "Anonymous decided it could not allow this to stand. If jailbreaking a phone for use of legal (unsigned) apps is found legal, why would this be any different for the Geohot case, seeing as Geohot explicitly states he does not support piracy?"