Follow TG Daily

Most Discussed Articles

More Discussions»

Articles By Tag

amd Android antitrust apple ARM atom blackberry china facebook Firefox google Green Dam hp ibm intel internet iphone microsoft mozilla netbook nokia PS3 Samsung security smartphone Sony twitter wii Windows 7 Xbox 360
Read more at
   SmallNetBuilder.com
Try our new and free
Price Comparison Service

Partners

Reviews & Rankings



AMD’s first 45 nm processor in volume production

PDF Print E-mail
Hardware
By Wolfgang Gruener   
Tuesday, September 30, 2008 10:39
San Francisco (CA) - AMD somewhat surprisingly confirmed in a conversation with Cnet’s Brooke Crothers that the company’s first 45 nm processor is in full production “right now”. First silicon from the production should be arriving at partners shortly, which would mean that the company can keep its promise to introduce the 45 nm Opteron, code-named “Shanghai” in Q4. A desktop version will follow with the usual delay of about 60 days.




Last year’s introduction of the 65 nm quad-core Opteron processor with Barcelona core, was not especially impressive. Initial delays were amplified through a TLB bug that sent shockwaves through the company and caused AMD to lose market share in the DP and MP server markets to Intel. Barcelona servers such as Sun’s M2 models arrived 8 months later than originally anticipated. According to an article published by Cnet, the 45 nm shrink, Shanghai is “ready to go” and will be available in product before the end of the year.

Image

AMD claims that Shanghai will be about 20% faster than Barcelona at comparable clock speeds, it will offer three times the cache (6 MB instead of 2 MB) and support Hypertransport 3. AMD decided to roll out 45 nm with the higher-end, more profitable Opterons first and launch a 45 nm desktop CPU, code-named Deneb, with some distance. That distance is typically 60-90 days, but it appears that Deneb is prepped for a Q4 rollout as well. As it looks right now, Shanghai could be announced in October and Deneb a few weeks before Christmas.           

AMD told Cnet that the launch of the 45 nm Shanghai was pulled in from an originally scheduled Q1 2009, which, according to our sources, is due to a better than expected scaling of the CPU. However, AMD somewhat forgot to note that the introduction schedule was changed earlier this year. According to the company’s original 45 nm rollout schedule, Shanghai may actually be between three and six months late. Back in 2006, then president Dirk Meyer (and CEO today) promised journalists and analysts that AMD would cut the distance to Intel from 12 down to 6 months, while we now know that AMD really has not gained any ground.

When we recently asked AMD about this promise, we were told that AMD would cut the time distance to Intel with future process generations. We are left scratching our head over this one and wonder why AMD keeps stressing that their 45 nm chips are early, when, in fact, they are late. While we don’t care whether AMD is early or late as long as they have competitive CPUs, it just doesn’t look good making those “early” claims.

Shanghai will maintain an “average power consumption” 55, 75 and 105 watts and, according to the company, we should expect at least one Shanghai SKU to outperform Intel’s six-core Dunnington processor. AMD’s own six-core processor, code-named Istanbul (all AMD server and desktop processor code names follow the locations of Formula 1 race tracks), is promised to be introduced as a monolithic CPU in Q4 of 2009, also with an average power consumption of 55, 75 and 105 watts.      

Comments (8)Add Comment
Sep 30, 2008 11:24     
Sep 30, 2008 17:09     
Oct 01, 2008 03:19     
Oct 01, 2008 16:09     
Oct 02, 2008 12:21     
Oct 03, 2008 21:00     

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
Recommend article:
Slashdot
Digg
Delicious
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
Stumble
NewsVine
Ma.gnolia
Subscribe to the TG Daily Newsletter
Email:
 

Shop Keywords: AMD, Shanghai, Deneb, Istanbul, 45nm, Opteron

-view -hardware -135 --135
Powered By Page_Cache by Ircmaxell
Generated in 0.828747987747 Seconds