iPhone battery lawsuit rejected, lawyers eating Taco Bell tonight
Business and Law
By Humphrey Cheung
Friday, September 26, 2008 17:13
Chicago (IL) – A United States District Court judge has dismissed an iPhone battery lawsuit against Apple. Last year, Jose Trujillo claimed that consumers weren’t given fair warning about the factory replaceable nature of the phone battery. He also alleged that Apple didn’t inform people about the battery’s limited number of recharge cycles, but Northern District of Illinois Judge Matthew Kennelly wasn’t fooled by Trujillo’s lawsuit and granted Apple a summary judgment in dismissing the suit. So it looks like soft tacos and Mexican Pizzas at Taco Bell for Trujillo and his lawyer tonight.
Mr. Trujillo sued Apple in Illinois state court back in July 2007. The Cook County, Illinois resident was an early adopter of the first generation iPhone when it was launched last year, but claims he wasn’t adequately notified that the iPhone was a sealed unit with a soldered battery. As such, the battery is quite difficult for the average person to remove and replace. Trujillo also said the battery could only be charged approximately 300 times before needing a replacement for which Apple charges $86 (cost of battery and shipping).
It appears Trujillo must not have read Apple’s website, the product box or the hundreds – possibly thousands – of news reports about the phone. I mean it was one of the most talked about tech gadgets last year and people stood in line for days to buy the first models. Apple does state that the battery can be replaced by sending it back to the factory and yes the company does charge $86 for the replacement, but the iPhone comes with a one-year battery warranty which means the cost is waived if your battery goes kaboom in the first 12 months.
Furthermore, Apple states quite clearly that the battery doesn’t just die when it hits 300 charges … almost every known battery slowly degrades over time and the same is true for the iPhone. This is the exact text from Apple’s website, “A properly maintained iPhone battery is designed to retain up to 80% of its original capacity at 400 full charge and discharge cycles. You may choose to replace your battery when it no longer holds sufficient charge to meet your needs.” 80% after 400 full discharge cycles certainly sounds more than adequate to me and this should give at least two years of worry free use to even the heaviest iPhone users.
Despite all this information, Trujillo and his attorney, James R. Rowe of Chicago, thought they had a case. Seeing dollar signs, they hoped to gain class action lawsuit status so that other consumers could join their cause. Apple asked for and was granted a move to federal district court and on September 23rd, Judge Kennelly dismissed the lawsuit.
“Under the circumstances, no reasonable jury could find that deception occurred,” the judge wrote.
While Apple is now off the hook, Trujillo is still going after AT&T since they were named as a co-defendant in the lawsuit. Trujillo claims he wasn’t given the terms of service in paper form when he bought his iPhone. Judge Kennelly denied AT&T’s request for arbitration and a hearing is set for September 29.