LHC Day 1: The chase for the Higgs Boson begins |
|
|
|
| Trendwatch | ||||
| By Rick C. Hodgin | ||||
| Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:27 | ||||
|
Geneva (Switzerland) - The startup and initial testing performed at CERN's Large Hadon Collider (LHC) yesterday went off without a hitch. Everything the scientists intended on their to do list was carried out flawlessly and without any surprises. In fact mused one scientist, "I couldn't believe it. I had to look at the screens twice for it to sink in." The LHC has gone through its initial startup procedures and we are still here. The truly powerful colliding experiments will begin in the weeks and months to come.
As an almost sidenote related to all of the LHC news coming out recently, I found a rather interesting battle going on in the physics world. It seems that Professor Peter Higgs (now 79), who proposed the idea of the Higgs Boson, or "God Particle" 44 years ago when he was 35, is engaged in some theoretical competition. Since he proposed the Higgs Boson, scientists have tackled the idea of its exitence logically and philosophically, though with nobody being able to ultimately prove or disprove the theory through direct experimentation or math. In fact, the Higgs Boson is arguably the primary reason the LHC was constructed in the first place, if not to answer the more general question of "If not Higgs, how did it all begin?" And yet, not all of the physics community believes Higgs' "God Particle" even exists. Stephen Hawking, for example, does not believe the LHC will ever find the Higgs Boson. In fact, he once made a $100 bet that the particle does not even exist and believes that the basic understanding of "mass" will come from something far more interesting than a single particle. Upon hearing the news, Higgs responded to Hawking's claims by dismissing a paper Hawking wrote a while back on related research saying, "...frankly I don't think the way [Hawking] does it is good enough. My understanding is he puts together theories in particle physics with gravity... in a way which no theoretical physicst would believe is the correct theory." Tall words from Higgs against Hawking who once turned the scientific world on its ear by merging quantum electrodynamics and Einsteinian relativity to explain the way black holes slowly dissipate over time. It was once thought they continued to exist forever gobbling up more and more matter until ... another big bang. Still, Higgs' theory goes like this (greatly simplified): Shortly after the Big Bang there was a point and time where individual particles existed (in particle form), but without mass. It was not until the theorized "Higgs Field" was applied that the particles became massive and would be in the state we would call today as matter. Hawking believes there is a unifying force which relates particle physics and gravity, but Higgs believes you need "a lot more than just gravity to have a consistent theory." Higgs is very doubtful about Hawking's calculations, and Hawking believes Higgs theory is not sufficient yet for the true answer. This mini-battle between the big brains in particle physicists is not receiving much attention these days, at least as far as the LHC is concerned. But if found, Higgs will likely win the Nobel Prize. Scientists believe it could take anywhere from a few months to several years before the particle is found. And ironically enough, Hawking believes Higgs could win the Nobel prize just for the accomplishment of the LHC alone. Ultimately, as the "furious battle" rages on in the world of debate and philosophy, the hard components of the LHC machine itself went into solid operation yesterday without a hitch. As everything mechanical proved to be running completely smoothly some 100 meters below the Earth, it was only up here on the surface where the colliding of great scientific minds is found to be truly producing unexpected results.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (12)
![]() Write comment
|
||||