I understand her frustration, but seriously, she is making this WAY more epic than it needs to be.

A technical decision was made on the usability of the device. In exchange for not having to worry about accidental dials by leaving the phone unlocked in your pocket (A HUGE problem for all non-flip phones, touchscreen or not) you sacrifice usability for the relativly small population that has "Finger Nail Issues."

I don't really even like the iPhone, I believe for as cool as it is, it has some serious flaws and even I think this lady is being rediculous.

I usually disagree with most (if not all) comments bashing on the news here (mostly because they do not like the news or do not care about it).

But on this case, I read this one and was able to get to the end without understanding any of it!

I don't live in the US so I don't follow Hillary's comments on a daily basis... so why the hell is she mentioned in this news?? no idea.

The text then makes some odd changes in the things that are being mentioned - it is like a bunch of phrases put together... not a text.

I had even no knowledge about any fingernails problem with the iPhone... but ok, that was not to hard to figure out, I guess.

Yes, I did read the article on the other site and got some more information, so now I understand this text, BUT I still think it is poorly written (the change from the 1st to the 2nd sentence makes absolutely no sense).

Please try to be a little more carefull..

Regards,
Q