Markham (ON) – AMD has released Catalyst 7.10 yesterday, which, according to the company, will speed up the gaming performance of some its graphics card configurations by up to 80%. HD 2400 and HD 2600 cards get Crossfire support.

If you are unhappy with your ATI graphics card and the performance delivers in recently released games, there’s a good chance that the manufacturer’s latest driver update may fix this issue. Performance increases for certain games are what we are expecting by now from driver updates, but version 7.10 certainly is a standout.

AMD said that 70% DX10 speed gains can be seen in Crossfire HD 2000 configurations for BioShock and 14-67% for World in Conflict. Single HD 2600 and 2900 cards will be able to return about 20% more performance under World of Conflict.

The entire HD 2000 series will see “at least” 70% more speed under DX9 in World of Conflict, according to the manufacturer.

Other games that see improvements are Lost Planet (+20% in DX10 for HD 2000 Crossfire); Call of Juarez (+42% in DX10 on HD 2000 Crossfire, +34% on single cards); Company of Heroes (+80% in DX10 on Crossfire HD2000, 31% on single cards); Battlefield 2142 (5-23% on Crossfire HD 2400, 2600, X1300, X1550), Call of Duty (+7% on Crossfire/single card HD 2400 and 2600 systems); Enemy Territory: Quake Wars (+23% on X1000, HD 2000); FEAR (+16% on Crossfire X1950 XTX, X1650 XT, HD 2400, X1300/X1550) and Supreme Commander (+30% on HD 2000, X1000; at least 82% on Crossfire X1650, X1300/X1555).  

The new driver also comes with a few new features such as adaptive anti-aliasing for X1000 cards as well as Crossfire support for HD 2400 and H2600 cards.

The driver can be downloaded from AMD's website.

80% of what

Oct 12, 2007 12:16     

if you're starting at 5 fps in some titles...80% improvement gets you...9 fps. hurray!
zix report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Regret...

Oct 12, 2007 12:31     

And to think last month I bought nVidia... :(
salgado18 report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Big talk

Oct 12, 2007 13:02     

Lets see the big benchmarks!
enewmen report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Looks like its cross-fire oriented

Oct 12, 2007 13:06     

Seems to me like AMD is paying lotsa attention to the crossfire configs and the 2000 series. their loyal customers running on the X1900 series could use a boost before we jump to directX 10 too you know!
www.straightup.in.th report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Lost in the percentages

Oct 12, 2007 13:22     

AMD has brought this company way down with them. They throw out percentage gain that are very suspect. LOL 14.1% to 18% www.tgdaily.com/content/view/32292/135/ 15% to 30% thrown around in this one www.tgdaily.com/content/view/31682/140/ 16% to 42% www.tgdaily.com/content/view/32626/144/ The HD 2900 XT was released 7 months late and now 5 months later supposedly DX9 will be able to perform at the level of the old 1950 XTX. They collect premium dollar for old tech that was obviously barely tested far from finished drivers. A huge consumer ripoff... 1) HD 2900 XT on a old 80nm process 2) Hardware encoding and decoding missing for high def video on high end model 3) 512 meg RAM to battle against 640 and 768 4) Cross Fire problems not working or being reduced to 32 bit mode 5) Drivers untested and unfinished Wow ! must be nice to run a shabby company If they have truly fixed cross fire for HD 2600's. I'd be willing to bet that a crossfire setup of 65 nm HD 2600 XT OC with the 512 DDR4 (I paid 129 with a $10 rebate) costing about $250 would kill the 80 nm HD 2900 XT at 400 plus.

Enlighten report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

How does ATI stack up in dx10 performance now?

Oct 12, 2007 13:36     

Does this mean ATI is ready for another Tom's Hardware DirectX 10 Showdown?
D report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

I'll beleive it when I see it........

Oct 12, 2007 13:39     

...on tomshardware.com that is!!!
Gweedo report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

give us benchies

Oct 12, 2007 13:44     

let's see how the scores scale!
person report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

hmm interesting

Oct 12, 2007 14:05     

i'd certainly like to see some benchmarks with these new drivers. tomshardware, maybe you could get on that already :)
brent report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

I guess we need new comparative benchmarks...

Oct 12, 2007 14:05     

...using 7.10 drivers. If only to see whther the improvements are as impressive as mentionned in the release notes and to compare ATI and Nvidia performance... again...
RoOophy report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

vapor releases anyone?

Oct 12, 2007 14:09     

This reminds of a few years ago when NVidia and ATI would do vapor hardware releases. I.E. they would announce their new top end card but you couldn't find it in stores until months later. So now you can get the hardware when they announce the cards but it wont do what it's suppose to until months later... I feel sorry for all those ppl that bought an HD card when they came out and now they are so much cheaper and only now can you get it's true performance.

karlito report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

put it to the test

Oct 12, 2007 14:41     

Will we see new benchmarks from Tom's Hardware to prove/disprove these claims from ATI? 70-80% performance increases is a mighty boast, but its one that ATI needs to get right if they want to compete with nVidia, who has been kicking their butts left and right with Dx10 cards.
drewR report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Isn't this just a great DRIVER UPDATE?

Oct 12, 2007 15:22     

I don't see how this is about any specific games. It would seem to me the drivers were just tweaked for bandwidth hogging code or some processes were rerouted through the shaders more efficiently, or both. I'm sure every game not on this list would show some nice improvement as well. Is that not the case? This is almost DOWNPLAYING the driver! I'd like some actual STAFF feedback on this question please, thanks.

Arsene Rupan III report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

New benchmarking tests

Oct 12, 2007 15:22     

Does this mean we can expect a retest of the major AMD/ATI cards from Tom's? I would really like to see if these claims are true or just hype.
MW report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

I hope THG will update their DirectX 10 Shootout...

Oct 12, 2007 15:24     

I hope THG will update their DirectX 10 Shootout
andy report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

shootout

Oct 12, 2007 15:59     

did your dx10 shootout include the new drivers? would like to know how the radeons are doing if you didnt.
mike report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Don't count on it

Oct 12, 2007 16:02     

We've all seen it before.... The computer industry lives on false claims and missleading or down-right false advertising. I would be suprised if these new drivers give you even a 10% increase. Gaining 10% with just a driver revision is actually pretty good though.
Bob report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

no new

Oct 12, 2007 16:34     

advantages for my X800xtpe agp :( guess it's back to playing doom 3 all over again.
mazuki report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

" 'at least' 70% more under DX9"

Oct 12, 2007 16:38     

I'll believe it when I see it.
Tyler report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

but is it true?

Oct 12, 2007 17:02     

Can anyone confirm if there really is a huge boost in performance with the new drivers? because that sounds like a huge increase.
Mike report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Very nice!

Oct 12, 2007 17:16     

My current box uses an Nvidia GPU, but that is a pretty solid driver update. It's good to see AMD is keeping on top of graphics drivers, especially for those using a Crossfire setup.
Alexvrb report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

I got them Tuesday....

Oct 12, 2007 17:23     

I got the drivers on Tuesday and haven't tested them as of yet. I know that I am able to play HL2:E2 on 1280x1024 with everything maxed ncluding full HDR and everything else maxed out and its smooth as all get out even at the end with the striders blowing up buildings and with the Advisors thingymagig. I guess I'll test 3DMark06 and HL2 Lost coast to see if my score goes up or if my 70FPS in Lost Cost goes up.

Jimmy report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Ppl, please share results!

Oct 12, 2007 17:35     

For those who have ATI cards, could you please tell us what your previous benchmarks were and after install the new Catalyst driver?
Jon report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Bench it!

Oct 12, 2007 18:30     

Yeah, give us tha Benchmarks so we can see for ourselves.
Gemmy report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

It's PR spin for...

Oct 12, 2007 18:35     

our drivers sucked before. Now we have fixed some HUGE bugs.
Will report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Typical

Oct 12, 2007 21:15     

As usual, dropping updates for "old" (x1950 age, excluding XTX) cards. And I swear I already had adaptive AA on my x1950 pro back with cat 7.2 and older...
randomizer report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

I think nivida is definately wining this game

Oct 12, 2007 21:18     

nivida cards have been pretty good from the start.. well the 8800xxx ones are ne ways.. AMD/ATI are jst releaseing crap atm ...there CPU's better get getter or there'll be no price war
Andrew report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

False...all false.

Oct 12, 2007 21:52     

I just RMA'd my HD2900 Pro. Pure hype people. Put it this way, if I'm getting 15 frames in DX10 and I get, 80%, that's 27 frames. But, you won't get 70% increase in the HD2900 series of products, maybe 10% at most, which is just a 1.5 FPS gain, so 16.5 frames. BIG WHOOP!! It's hype people, 70% maybe in a specific application under DX10 or 9, but not OVERALL. That's the issue here. It's not 70 or 80% across the board, it's when doing ONE application, and come to think of it, did AMD claim 3d application performance increase or 2D application performance increase? We assume 3d, but in all actuality it could be 2D...we don't know. But from http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=463 they state this, "The move from the 7.9 driver to the 7.10 "Shoot-em-up" Catalyst update didn't have much of an effect on our single graphics card performance at all. In only one or two instances did we see any changes, and neither was what I would call "drastic" enough to change my opinion on the HD 2900 XT for the current generation of DX10 games. The HD 2900 XT is a solid competitor against NVIDIA's 8800 GTS 640MB, but the Catalyst 7.10 driver hasn't done anything to overtake it." The boost came from HD2900XT Crossfire platforms, NOT SINGLE GPU SETUPS!! ATI/AMD is still way behind...

Justin report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Wolfgang Gruener

Oct 12, 2007 21:53     

your such and amd/ati fanboy stop writing articles period.
dude report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

lol nubs

Oct 12, 2007 21:58     

Its about time they stared useing that gddr4 you got to be dumb to think that the grafic cards where being used to there full potental it has more stream prosessers faster clock and gddr4 it was bound to happen AMD is now giving you the keys to unlock the beast. If your still either a intel hugger or a nvidia junky get over it AMD has the best over all design and power under the hood.
Rob report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

7.10's rock

Oct 12, 2007 23:46     

I have been using since last night, big difference on x1950pro vista 64 on cs source, bf2, and bioshock
jason rhodes report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

I can vouch for some of these numbers

Oct 13, 2007 01:52     

I have been waiting for this release. I have had a 2900XT for a few months. Every driver update has improved performance. I downloades this driver yesturday. My system doesn't crash under max settings, finally, and I am seeing a big improvement in FPS. I have no regrets buying this card.
Bren report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Awesome Man

Oct 13, 2007 02:18     

Just great another new driver. Hmm, 7.9 was good because it drives up my game FPS by around 30 - 40 and what now? another 30-40? Hmm, Can't wait to try the new driver out. Since I havn't benching since the 7.8 drivers.
Dude report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Not for me

Oct 13, 2007 03:43     

I got MSI HD 2600 XT (stock speeds), XP, DX9, AMD 64 X2 5200 , 2 GB RAM and after the update i got no speed increase on the WIC in-built benchmark. exact same result. i wonder where the promised "The entire HD 2000 series will see “at least” 70% more speed under DX9 in World of Conflict, according to the manufacturer." went.
Sharad report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

lol Rob

Oct 13, 2007 06:40     

Better design? I guess, if you're into slower, hotter PCs. There's always one, and your spelling tells the whole story.
Bob report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Im glad W G is writing this

Oct 13, 2007 07:07     

Reading some of these misconceptions, falsehoods and out n out fanboish lies, Im glad Wolfgang wrote this. 256 and 512 vs 640 and 768? Whatever happened to the 1 gig 2900? And isnt the new 8800gt supposed to be 512? Look, the boys are back in town, and if they dont wanna know, forget em. There exists 1 card better than the 2900, the GTX, thats it (the ultra is just a suped up GTX) so theres no domination here, and with the new releases, ATI will be competitive. If 80 NM is old, then whats the 8800 series done on? Sheeesh

John report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Re: "lol nubs"

Oct 13, 2007 08:06     

rofl!!! just rofl!!!
krazy report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

stop dissing ati

Oct 13, 2007 08:28     

You ATI bashers are just sad sad people. They can't handle the fact that maybe not only ATI cards are more advanced but also can in some cases surpass their precious nVidia cards in speed too. I have nothing against nVidia and I think they make very powerful graphics hardware. But so does ATI.
Sound of reason report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

LOL Rob

Oct 13, 2007 09:50     

What are you on? AMD/ATI are in a major financial mess, nVidia has taken the DX10 ball and is running with it, I used to be an ATI fan used ATI ever since the old 9800 cards and I currently have cross fire x1950XTX in my pc, I was thinking of getting the X2900 but after seeing the benchmarks I decided to hold of, AMD's acquasition of ATI has parctically destroyed the competition unless they can pull something out of their behinds and I am not talking about some rubbish PR about drivers. time to wake up and smell the fresh coffee.

Sam report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Ati Driver Rep Is What Made Me Switch To Nvidia

Oct 13, 2007 10:41     

Ati has always had issues with great cards and bad drivers. Thisis going way to back to when Rage Pro was a card to be reckoned with. If there claim prevails I just might start buying back into my Canadian company. I can't wait until Tom's puts the claim to the test!
Lucid report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Not a massive deal

Oct 13, 2007 11:59     

the 2900 is still a direct competitor to the 8800 gts. only now the 2900 isn't as bad as it was at crossfire or dx10. the way they have worded it makes it sound alot beter than it really is. thos big increases are when in sli in dx10. but its still good news, competition is always great news for the consumer. don't be fanbois.
Joe report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Sam, i think your confused

Oct 13, 2007 14:16     

AMD didnt screw the R600(completely), it was well into development when ATI was acquired. And until i purchased my 2900 Pro i had been using Nvidia for my last 2 cards 6800GT/7900GT, So don't assume I'm a fanboy. and Last gen it was the opposite ATI led, and Nvidia was behind with the 7 Series. Sure Nvidia used less power and was quieter, But the 1900's were ahead in performance.
cliffro report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

dont talk till you have tried both

Oct 13, 2007 17:07     

I have both I compared them the ATI card is much faster than it was but still won’t do everything yet, AMD has given you 1 key so far jest hold on. I normally find it the other way around the Nvidia cards have a hell of a time with drivers and ATI normally has a easy time I was actually fairly surprised about the recent ATI card drivers myself I had a feeling they were not using them to their full potential. My AMD still uses less power and puts out less heat than my core 2 duo at apx. The same clock speeds. (INCLUDING OFF DIE MEMORY CONTROLLER/NORTH BRIDGE) I haven't gotten my hands on a quad AMD, well not sitting in fount of me but I expect the same results (server processors). The desktop quad I expect will be the same. Yes I run both AMD and Intel; Do I have a loyalty to any of them? no if Intel makes a processor that is better than an AMD equal ill jump right over the same goes with Nvidia and ATI/AMD. Now the main reason I’m with AMD right now is I can now have 32 core servers and a maximum of 8 with Intel on one system and it’s not a toaster, more pins for more bandwidth, cooler, uses less power, easy to upgrade, has a on die memory controller, float point calculations per sec, has everything on one die, and let’s face it Hyper-Transport. It’s Time to wake up and smell that fresh brewed coffee.

Rob report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

ATI low point has always been CRAPPY SOFTWARE.

Oct 13, 2007 17:11     

Great hardware, but worthless with their crappy drivers. Hackers seem to have always created better work arounds then what ATI publishes. They just don't know how to optimize their code, (i.e. the kings of graphic fatware) or create an uninstaller that doesn't jack everything up. But very nice hardware. NVidia is admitingly less but because it works, they win. How often would you drive a sport car with 1 mpg?

Steveorevo report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Do some research intel/nvidia dolts

Oct 13, 2007 19:25     

Nvidia made a DX9 card with token DX10 support a year before any games would be out to support it. It's been established that nvidia has performed horribly in Vista, under dc10 since the HD2900 came out. Where as it's the opposite for ATI, it's a DX10 card with token support for dx9, it is optimized FOR dx10 games, and they didn't care too much how it fared in old titles. As for AMD vs intel, the only area where intel wins in power consumption is laptops. Despite having a larger die, memory controller and higher voltage requirements AMD chips still consumer less power, both at idle and peak, overall systems consumer 40% less power, and run at least 30% cooler then intel. As for nvidia....overpriced, power hungery cards that you can use to grill up a burger on.

Iseefractals report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

RE: Sound of reason

Oct 13, 2007 20:39     

"ATI cards are more advanced but also can in some cases surpass their precious nVidia cards in speed too." If thats true how come Nvidia gpus do better in games? oh wait thats right Nvidia is kicking ATIs ass. you are just pissed that you have a shitty Grahpics card.
Tom report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

THG definately needs an update.

Oct 13, 2007 22:20     

I have never seen the poor performance on my ATI 2900 that Tom's guys have. Not sure how they did that poorly. My 2900 has performed extremely well since the 7.8 drivers. Tom's used to be a good source for qualified and equal hardware reviews. Not any more I guess.
Narg report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

nVidia drivers not that good either.

Oct 13, 2007 22:21     

Try nVidia drivers under 64-bit Vista and you won't be saying they are that great. ATI's 64-bit support rocks.
Narg report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

ATI better than advertised.

Oct 13, 2007 22:42     

I will publish full benchmark results later, however on the old drivers I was scoring 17432 FPS on Atari classic pong. With the new drivers I get 33774. That is over 190%! I love the new drivers. I just wish they would support Windows 3.1.
RalfTheDog report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Gay Friendly

Oct 14, 2007 06:30     

Since nVidia did not answer the question that are they Gay friendly publicly, I guest for me ATI is the only option for now since did score 80/100 from HRC research of LGBT right inside their company. But I still not buying AMD processor until the meet Intel 100% in LGBT right.
Lawrence report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

About time

Oct 14, 2007 06:43     

Well it appears the rumours are true and suddenly the ATI cards are competitive - good news because that means Nvidia price drops - they happened today! Iseefractals in a Lady-Boy-Fan-Boy if I have ever seen one - reads Toms Hardware for how Nvidia kicks ATI's ass in DX10 in every game - these results will help their cause, but to say ATI is the better DX10 card is laughable
Blow report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

7.8 -> 7.9 -> 7.10 ??

Oct 14, 2007 08:54     

7.8 -> 7.9 -> 7.10 ?? Wow, someone at AMD/ATI must've missed the math lessons in school eh? hehe, I'm gonna give the new drivers a shot when I get home.. But they better have solved the TV-Out issues for the X19xx series.
Z report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Fanboys

Oct 14, 2007 12:26     

Look at all the bs flying around in here. First off AMD's current CPU's are in no way more efficient than Intel(not clock for clock or power). When it was P4 vs A64 yes. Core2 vs A64 X2, No chance with the exception to idle power. Since my computer is always at load that does not matter to me. Now ATI vs Nvidia. I have had the same number of both. I go with what is fast. So far all ATI cards i have owned i changed the stock heat sinks on due to noise. So Nvidia wins there(GF4ti was dead silent, 8800GTX quite every thing in between was ATI : 9800pro , X850XT and X1900XT). Performance wise it depends on what games you play. For OpenGL Nvidia wins 90% of the time. for DX9 its about half half(if you get a comparable card). For DX10 with the 7.9 Nvidia was winning. Who knows how the new drivers are.... Do i believe this 80% here 23 percent there and so on. NO They said the X1000 cards would get a 23% ETQW boost. tested(X1900XT 512) and busted Average frame rates are the same max are the same min are lower(but this could be a test anomaly or the new drivers actually drop the min...ouch...3dmarks 2005 and 2006 lost some points too, but once again. i see no difference in the new driver.) So fanboys on both sides get ure stories straight or shut up....

Nukemaster report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

RE: Do some research intel/nvidia dolts

Oct 14, 2007 15:22     

Iseefractals: BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAW, I WISH I BOUGHT INTEL/NVIDIA PRODUCTS, WHY DO I HAVE TO BE SUCH A FANBOY. ATi vs nVidia: Name some games that the HD29xx sweeps the floor with the 8800's. Oh wait you can't. http://www.pcper.com/article.php?type=expert&aid=463 Catalyst 7.10 vs nVidia. Notice how the 8800 cards consistently matches/beats the HD2900. Especially during in the World in Conflict benching (which is a DX10 game) AMD vs Intel: Who cares about how much power a processor takes up? Running a computer doesn't really zap that much energy. Is the processor is too hot for you? Buy a better heatsink. Enjoy running your games on your inferior performing computer that "consumes 40% less power and runs 30% cooler."

Arch report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Fire the software department

Oct 14, 2007 16:48     

If you can get 80% out of the same hardware just because of a crappy driver, fire the software department. I admit to knowing very little about programming graphics drivers, but if there's any truth in those percentages, the code must have been a disaster. I bet that's one of the real reasons companies are so reluctant to open-source some of their code...
Wouter report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

Iseefractals, do you even know what a graphics card...

Oct 14, 2007 16:53     

Iseefractals, do you even know what a graphics card is?
bobert report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

8800 series owns and the new 8900 will also own!

Oct 14, 2007 19:29     

Ati X800 pro card was a great card for me for 3 years but it cant compare to my 8800 GTS 640 with the new games on max settings!
Barry L report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

I think ATI is on panic

Oct 14, 2007 20:07     

I think when nvidia's geforce 8 were released they hurried to catch up for the market and skipped some driver features just for the sake, which is bad for the consumers. I agree to karlito. It's frustrating for gamers who bought ATI cards first. Well, at least, ATI is cheering them up now. I wish luck for ATI and I hope they can be competitive this time with nvidia. I'm on no side between nvidia and ATI. I use intel onboard video..lol.

Von report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

choice 101

Oct 14, 2007 20:12     

i have a choice to make.... I am buying a laptop for under 1k, i have the choice between an HD2600 and a GF8400. What do you think ill pick? (BTW the geforce model has a smaller screen for the same price, both use an AMD TL-56, 1gb ram, 120gb hdd) I dont know... but the ATI based one seems a bit better of a deal... Price is a factor that is hard to deny. While you may get better performance from a top end Nvidia, you pay more. All the benchmarks in the world dont matter if you cant afford the price tag (which im guessing most of you cant, and are just shouting about benchmarks-LAME-). So before you go out and buy a vid card, make sure you are getting your moneys worth. You may find that one or the other company has a better card in your price range. Dont be a whore to one company, you will lose 90% of the time. Do your resarch, and dont assume that because one company has the top card, that the rest of their lineup is better too. This applies to all computer hardware.

mike report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0

DX10 performance gain - valid claim

Oct 14, 2007 20:40     

I did see some notable gains in 'World in Conflict' under DirectX10 with the 7.10 drivers. The results from the WiC benchmark yielded almost a 100% gain in performance under the new 7.10 drivers. I got 17/9/38 (avg/min/max) fps results at 1920x1200 with the new driver versus 9/5/15 fps with the 7.9 drivers. I also ran the test using DX9 with WiC and 3DMark06, but noticed negligible improvements - still obtain an average of 11450 in 3DMark06. Good job ATI/AMD - keep the improvements coming.

Paul report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0