
Overclocking:
Intel's Nehalem insanely overclocked
Electric Motorcycle inventor crashes at NextFest
“KillaCycle” electric motorcycle inventor almost
killed himself at the Wired NextFest conference.
>> See all TG Daily videos
| Background: What Fusion will be – and what not |
|
|
|
| Trendwatch | |||||
| By Wolfgang Gruener | |||||
| Friday, May 11, 2007 08:53 | |||||
Page 3 of 3
How Fusion fits into Torrenza
![]() The second socket on the Wahoo board for Agena FX quad-core processors could also be used for a third party accelerator.
![]() Fab 30 in Dresden, Germany Any additional flexibility will help AMD to compete with Intel – whether it is the addition of bulk capability to its own fabs (which they do not have at this time) or added SOI capacity. In this sense, AMD’s recent announcement to build a 32 nm fab in Luther Forest in New York actually begins to make a whole lot of sense. Breaking ground is expected to happen between July 2007 and July 2009; the production ramp could start sometime between 2009 and 2011 or about the time when AMD expects Fusion to ramp into the market. There is no doubt that Luther Forest will be critical for AMD to be able to deliver a reliable and flexible product mix of Fusion (and other non-accelerated processors which are expected co-exist with Fusion.) Conclusion I am still scratching my head over how successful the Fusion concept can be. There are some exciting elements in Fusion, especially the idea of supercomputing performance for your desktop. In virtually any area of the market, you could see 20x – 30x performance jumps in certain application areas. But Fusion isn’t quite a product yet. Keep in mind, it is a concept that is just beginning to take shape. The software challenge is massive and AMD has to invest enormous energy to educate a new generation of developers and create enough incentive for them to tap the general purpose horsepower of a heterogeneous processor. The transition to 64-bit applications and multicore has taught us that convincing a critical mass of developers to switch to a new programming style is everything else but easy. It is unclear at this time which path Intel will taking. Will both companies will drive this idea of “accelerated computing”? Perhaps. But we don’t know for sure. AMD executives said that they don’t care what Intel will do and that they won’t turn around and won’t follow Intel. However, chief technology officer Phil Hester noted that AMD would like to work with Intel on this topic: “It’s their call,” he said during a briefing. Listening to AMD executives, product managers and engineers throughout a two-day event, there is little doubt that the company is betting big time on Fusion, its potential to achieve new performance heights and to become something that is different from what Intel may offer. There is a lot of energy and enthusiasm surrounding this project and, from our subjective impression, the idea of Fusion should be powerful enough to fuel a new wave of fresh ideas and innovation. And there’s certainly nothing wrong with that. What do you think? Does Fusion make sense? What feature would you especially interested in such a chip? Let us know and write a comment in the form below.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (54)
![]() | |||||